🗞 TRUSTING NEWS 美國《信任新聞》*｜20210914
✅ Journalists, it’s time to talk about our biases
記者們，是時候來談談我們的偏見了！
What do journalists tend to have in common, and what about us is the same or different from the communities we serve?
Read More
✅ 遭質疑危害少女心理健康 IG 將淡化鼓吹美體圖｜中央社｜20210915
✅ 網家拚轉型 新任技術長找來Grindr前總裁｜工商時報｜20210915
✅ 公視法修正草案預告 公視董事：贊同下修任命門檻｜聯合報｜20210916
🗞 MEDIUM 美國部落格發布平台《媒介》｜20210908
✅ What does “fairness” in news stories actually look like?
在新聞報導中的「公平」實際上看起來是什麼樣子？
Users want us to focus on fact, not interpretation. What does that look like?
*When we insert opinion are we labeling it as “opinion”?
*If we offer any kind of “analysis” how are we labeling that?
*Do the labels appear clearly and follow when shared off the original platform?
*Do we explain what the labels we use mean, especially when it comes to opinion content?
✅ 《蘋果日報》母公司壹傳媒宣布將清盤｜紐時中文網｜20210906
✅ 澳洲最高法院判決 媒體在臉書的言論應負法律責任｜聯合報｜20210908
✅ 微軟推出名為「Start」的個人化新聞｜Engadget 中文網｜20210908
🗞 CNN 美國《有線電視新聞網》｜20210901
✅ For misinformation peddlers on social media, it’s three strikes and you’re out. Or five. Maybe more
社群媒體上不實資訊的散佈者注意！現在是三振，然後你就出局！等等，或許五振？也許更多振？
It is widely believed by misinformation researchers that one of the most powerful — if controversial — tools that social media platforms have in combating misinformation from public figures and lesser-known individuals alike is to kick the worst offenders off entirely. But before platforms take that step, they typically follow a more nuanced (and sometimes confusing) system of strike policies that can vary from platform to platform, issue to issue and even case by case. These policies often stay out of the spotlight until a high-profile suspension occurs.
Read More