國際傳媒：2026/05/29～2026/06/04

2026 年 06 月 05 日 | 媒大事

▍國際傳媒：2026/05/29～2026/06/04

✎ Current 非營利媒體《CURRENT》｜20260603: Overhauled NPR dues model provides incentives for closer collaboration; 改革會費拆帳機制！NPR 祭出經濟誘因，促成總部與地方電台「更緊密合作」; NPR is finalizing a new model for calculating stations’ membership dues that also offers options for them to save money.
✎ Columbia Journalism Review 美國《哥倫比亞新聞評論》｜20260601: How Does Access Work Now?; 如今，採訪管道是怎麼運作的？; Journalists, podcasters, and news influencers on the erosion of access—what it’s worth, and what it isn’t.
✎ The Verge 美國科技新聞網路媒體《THE VERGE》｜20260529: Hundreds of prolific Wikipedia editors are threatening to go on strike; 數百位維基百科「高產量編輯」威脅將集體罷工; After the Wikimedia Foundation abruptly dissolved a beloved team of engineers, Wikipedia’s volunteers are angry — and discussing how they can push back.
✎ Nieman Lab 哈佛大學尼曼新聞基金會《尼曼新聞實驗室》｜20260528: Think the media’s biased against you? You probably think misinformation is too; 覺得媒體對你有偏見？那你大概也會認為假訊息同樣針對你; A new study finds that the same motivated reasoning and partisan instincts that make people see bias in mainstream news also shape how they perceive “fake news.”
✎ Guardian 英國《衛報》｜20260603: What do UK watchdog’s new rules on Google AI results mean for publishers?; 英國監管機關針對 Google AI 搜尋結果祭出新規，對新聞出版業者意味著什麼？; Giving news websites the power to block their content from being used in AI summaries will have global ramifications
✎ Pew Research Center 美國皮尤研究中心｜20260601: Federal agency X accounts are getting far more engagement in the second Trump term than under Biden; 川普第二任期內，聯邦機關 X（前推特）帳號互動量遠勝拜登時期; Federal agencies are getting far more audience engagement on X (formerly Twitter) in the second Trump administration than they did during the final year of the Biden administration, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis.
✎ Global Investigative Journalism Network 非營利組織《全球深度報導網》｜20260528: Tansa: Pioneering a New Model for Investigative Journalism in Japan; 非營利組織東京調查新聞室Tansa：開創日本調查報導新模式的先驅; Newspaper sales remain strong in Japan, but large circulations don’t automatically mean plentiful space for investigative or watchdog journalism.
✎ Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 英國牛津路透新聞學研究所｜20260601: New York Times publisher A. G. Sulzberger on why (and how) news publishers should fight AI platforms; 《紐約時報》發行人蘇茲伯格（A. G. Sulzberger）談新聞出版業者為何（以及該如何）對抗 AI 平台; As a result, I fear we are careening toward a future with fewer and fewer journalists to do the expensive, difficult work of original reporting – going to places, talking to people, digging up information, covering important issues and events, providing context and analysis, investigating the powerful. A future where a crucial wellspring of a healthy society and a stable democracy – the truth, understanding and accountability provided by original journalism – continues to dry up.