▍國際傳媒：2020/05/01~2020/05/07

✅MEDIUM ｜20200502

🔗How the Wall Street Journal’s New Calendars Help Readers Plan for the News

For instance, each calendar we make gets a landing page, where potential subscribers can preview the kinds of events they’ll start getting in their own calendars. This means we can test people’s appetite for calendars on a number of other topics.

✅THE IRISH TIMES｜20200503

🔗Journalists’ union seeks tech-giants tax to ‘rescue’ industry

Media firms getting public cash should have 25% employee representation on board – NUJ.

✅COLUMBIA JOURNALISM REVIEW ｜20200504

🔗Op-ed: Covering science at dangerous speeds

One could argue that a pandemic like COVID-19 shifts the calculus on the benefits of embargoes, but that only holds if reporters use the additional time to digest findings and call experts unrelated to the study for comment. And the reality is that journalists don’t have as much time as they need.

✅POYNTER｜20200504

🔗Here are the winners of the 2020 Pulitzer Prizes

The Pulitzer Prizes are generally regarded as the highest honor that U.S.-based journalists and organizations can receive.

✅LOS ANGELES TIMES｜20200504

🔗Op-Ed: How film and television production can safely resume in a COVID-19 world

That means rejiggering productions, locations and set schedules to postpone shooting crowd or action scenes and intimate moments, as well as scenes that require international travel. Some shows will need to rewrite scripts or look to add visual effects to what previously would have been shot live. 

✅THE GUARDIAN ｜20200504

🔗Male experts dominate UK news shows during coronavirus crisis

Study shows imbalance of 2.7 men for every woman on radio and TV programmes in March.

✅FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT BOARD｜20200506

🔗Announcing the First Members of the Oversight Board

The Board will take final and binding decisions on whether specific content should be allowed or removed from Facebook and Instagram.

✅THE GUARDIAN｜20200506

🔗French government takes down coronavirus ‘fake news’ web page

Journalists’ union argued page was ‘clear interference in press freedom’.

整理：朱弘川╱編輯：鄭凱榕